Zotac GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB Amp! Extreme review

December 10, 2012 | 09:42

Tags: #custom-cooler #factory-overclock #geforce

Companies: #zotac

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Publisher: Bethesda

From our The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim review:

'It’s like watching Star Wars and genuinely thinking, ‘what about those poor Death Star construction workers?’ You’re missing the point: Skyrim is a huge and engaging world to explore and it treats you with great moments, from your first dragon encounter to finally being able to craft dwarven armour.'

We've updated our Skyrim benchmark to include the official high resolution texture pack, available as a free DLC. We set the game to its 'Ultra' setting and record a sixty second manual play through just outside the town of Whiterun during a thunderstorm. We use a section where we are able to run forward in a straight line for a minute without being attacked so the benchmark remains consistent, and use the third person camera view.

Click to enlarge

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

1,920 x 1,080 4x AA 16x AF w/ high res texture pack, DirectX 9

  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 4GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB GHz Edition
  • Zotac GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB Amp! Extreme
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB with Boost
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB
  • EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB SSC
  • AMD Radeon HD 7770 1GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 1GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7750 1GB
    • 101
    • 142
    • 88
    • 110
    • 80
    • 103
    • 78
    • 96
    • 72
    • 95
    • 70
    • 88
    • 70
    • 87
    • 67
    • 82
    • 61
    • 79
    • 58
    • 73
    • 56
    • 71
    • 53
    • 64
    • 42
    • 54
    • 34
    • 43
    • 27
    • 36
    • 27
    • 34
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Frames Per Second
  • Minimum
  • Average

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

2,560 x 1,600 4x AA 16x AF w/ high res texture pack, DirectX 9

  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 4GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB GHz Edition
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB
  • Zotac GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB Amp! Extreme
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB with Boost
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB
  • EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB SSC
  • AMD Radeon HD 7770 1GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7750 1GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 1GB
    • 101
    • 132
    • 61
    • 77
    • 60
    • 73
    • 59
    • 74
    • 54
    • 66
    • 51
    • 66
    • 51
    • 62
    • 46
    • 60
    • 44
    • 54
    • 43
    • 54
    • 43
    • 54
    • 38
    • 47
    • 24
    • 35
    • 18
    • 25
    • 16
    • 21
    • 15
    • 24
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
Frames Per Second
  • Minimum
  • Average

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

5,760 x 1,080 4x AA 16x AF w/ high res texture pack, DirectX 9

  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 4GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB GHz Edition
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7970 3GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB with Boost
  • Zotac GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB Amp! Extreme
  • AMD Radeon HD 7950 3GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7870 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 Ti 2GB
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 2GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7850 2GB
  • EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 1GB SSC
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 1GB
  • AMD Radeon HD 7770 1GB
    • 43
    • 73
    • 33
    • 41
    • 33
    • 40
    • 30
    • 37
    • 29
    • 38
    • 28
    • 34
    • 27
    • 34
    • 27
    • 32
    • 25
    • 31
    • 23
    • 30
    • 22
    • 28
    • 20
    • 24
    • 5
    • 8
    • 1
    • 1
    • 0
    • 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Frames Per Second
  • Minimum
  • Average

Read our performance analysis.
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Noob? - Mon Dec 10 2012 09:55

Those cards look unbelieveably short but then again I've a HD7950 and a GTX680.

Posted by David - Mon Dec 10 2012 09:59

What a pointless card!

Normally I'm a fan of Zotac's efforts, but £250 for a card that, when you wring it's neck, almost gets close to the stock performance of a card that can be had for less than £15 more. The only benefit I see is lower temps from the cooler - nowhere near enough to justify the price.

To be fair, Nvidia left the partners on a hiding to nothing when the 660Ti launched at a price so close to that of the 670, so I'm surprised that Zotac made the effort at all. Surely there's more mileage in souping up a 660 non Ti card?

Noob?
Those cards look unbelieveably short but then again I've a HD7950 and a GTX680.
Same as the reference 670 (without the cooler), by look of it. I have a block on mine, and it only measures 175mm.

Posted by iajo - Mon Dec 10 2012 10:28

7950 from £220 on scan so £30 saving similar performance and could also be overclocked to be faster again if needed. I like Nvidia but their mid ranged cards seem a little overpriced.

Posted by CAT-THE-FIFTH - Mon Dec 10 2012 11:52

The drivers used were GeForce 306.23 for the Nvidia cards and Catalyst 12.8 for the AMD cards. The newer driver revisions have improved performance especially for the AMD cards.
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.